Everything you need to know about the Aboriginal Voice

   - Yes or No

The Australian Voice is a proposed alteration to the Australian Constitution aims to recognize the First Peoples of Australia by establishing an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander voice. This initiative comes as a response to historical injustices and a desire to empower Indigenous communities with greater influence over decisions that directly impact their lives and well-being. The concept of an Indigenous voice is rooted in the Uluru Statement from the Heart, which was born out of the 2017 Uluru National Constitutional Convention. During this gathering, Indigenous leaders across the country came together to address the longstanding issues faced by their communities and to chart a path towards greater self-determination and reconciliation.

The heart of the proposal is to create a constitutional change that would embed the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander voice within the Australian governance structure. The aim is to ensure that decisions that affect Indigenous peoples are made in consultation with them, rather than being imposed upon them without their input. The Indigenous voice would be a group of representatives, elected and empowered by Indigenous communities themselves, who would provide advice to the government and advocate on matters concerning Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.

The need for an Indigenous voice stems from a history of marginalization and disempowerment. Throughout Australia's history, Indigenous communities have endured policies that have adversely affected their lives, such as the White Australia Policy and the forced removal of Indigenous children from their families, known as the Stolen Generations. These policies have left a legacy of significant disparities in areas like health, education, and wealth between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians.

The idea behind the Indigenous voice is that by providing Indigenous communities with a say in the decisions that shape their lives, there is a greater chance of addressing the inequalities and historical injustices they face. The voice seeks to facilitate meaningful dialogue and partnerships between the government and Indigenous communities, working together towards positive change.

Despite its noble intentions, the proposal for an Indigenous voice has encountered challenges and differing perspectives. Some critics argue that the proposal lacks specificity and clarity on the exact powers and functions of the Indigenous voice. Concerns have been raised about the potential for the voice to have too much influence or not enough real impact on decision-making processes. Additionally, some argue that the focus should be on concrete policies and actions to address Indigenous disadvantage rather than symbolic recognition.

The government's decision to keep certain details of the voice's implementation flexible has also been a point of contention. While this approach allows for further consultation and refinement of the proposal, it has left some wanting more certainty before casting their vote in favor of the amendment.

The upcoming referendum to amend the Constitution will be a momentous occasion for Australia. A successful vote would signal a commitment to greater recognition, respect, and partnership with the First Peoples of this land. It is an opportunity to demonstrate a collective will to address historical wrongs and work towards a more equitable and inclusive society.

The proposed alteration to the Constitution seeks to recognize the First Peoples of Australia by establishing an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander voice. The voice aims to empower Indigenous communities by giving them a say in decisions that affect their lives and addressing historical injustices. However, the proposal has faced challenges and diverse opinions about its implementation. Despite these complexities, the referendum vote will be a defining moment for Australia, shaping its commitment to reconciliation, self-determination, and a more just society for all.

Questions for Reflections and Discussion
  1. What do you believe are the main reasons for proposing an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander voice in the Australian Constitution? How do you think it could address historical injustices and empower Indigenous communities?

  2. How familiar are you with the Uluru Statement from the Heart? What key points and principles does it advocate for, and how do you view its significance in the national conversation?

  3. In your opinion, what do you think should be the specific powers and functions of the Indigenous voice? How can the voice effectively influence decision-making processes while avoiding undue influence or tokenism?

  4. Do you think the proposal for an Indigenous voice should be more specific and detailed, or do you agree with keeping certain details flexible? How might the level of specificity impact the public's perception and support for the amendment?

  5. The success of the referendum requires a double majority of votes from all eligible voters and a majority of states. Do you think this is a fair threshold for constitutional change, considering Australia's past referendum experiences?

  6. Reflecting on Australia's history of colonialism and its impact on Indigenous communities, what role do you think the Constitution should play in recognizing and addressing historical injustices?

  7. Some critics argue that the focus should be on tangible policies and actions to address Indigenous disadvantage rather than symbolic recognition. How do you balance the importance of both concrete policy measures and symbolic representation?

  8. Indigenous communities have diverse perspectives on the proposed voice, with differing views on its necessity and effectiveness. How can the voice effectively represent the diversity of Indigenous voices and experiences?

  9. Considering the complexity of the issue, what are some potential challenges in the successful implementation of the Indigenous voice, and how can these challenges be overcome?

  10. Reflecting on the broader societal implications, how might the establishment of an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander voice contribute to reconciliation efforts and foster a more inclusive and equitable society for all Australians?

For more information click here......


Social Justice - How can prayer, reflection, and spiritual discernment be integrated into the process of See, Judge, and Act, helping us to align our actions and choices with the values of justice and compassion espoused by Catholic social teaching?
(By A. D. - Marist Laity - from AUSTRALIA - 2023-8-5)

Add to Conversation


Rating for May

Please click to rate 'thumbs up' or 'thumbs down'...

05 August 2023

Tag 1
Aboriginal Spirituality

Tag 2
Think Global

Tag 3
Act Local

Source Name
ABC News

Source URL


Watch the video by clicking play.

Click the RED thumbs up above.

Share this page by clicking the SOCIAL media icon below.

(Print Page)

Page Counter
21 visitors this month.

Marist Laity Australia - Home Page